Inksome News - Feature requests? [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
Inksome News Journal

[ website | Inksome ]
[ userinfo | inksome userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

Feature requests? [Aug. 30th, 2009|01:22 pm]
Previous Entry Add to Memories Tell a Friend Next Entry
[Tags|, , , ]

What features would you like to see in the new Inksome?

Planned features (note that a lot of these things might "go without saying", but I want to be clear):

  • No more "friends". Instead, the journals you read will be your "subscribed" list, and the users that read your journal will be your "subscribers". (Note: apparently this is what DW does, but I promise I came up with it independently. Great minds think alike. *g*)

  • Public / private / all subscribers / custom subscribers groups visibility of posts

  • Ability to control who can comment on your posts

  • Ability to screen comments on your posts

  • Userpics on your posts

  • Custom mood themes

  • Ability to edit posts and comments



If there's a feature that IS currently supports that I've left out of here, let me know. It's probably just an oversight on my part, but there are certain things - like BML - that I don't intend to support. Also, interoperability with existing LJ clients is important to me, but it's not happening until I've got the basic feature set implemented.
LinkReply

Comments:
[User Picture]From: [info]takefive
2009-08-30 07:05 pm (UTC)

(Link)

A userpic browser like on LJ would be fantastic.
[User Picture]From: [info]staff_kit
2009-08-30 07:33 pm (UTC)

(Link)

A userpic browser? I'm not sure what you mean by that.
[User Picture]From: [info]bedtime
2009-08-30 09:29 pm (UTC)

(Link)

i think they meant something like this.
[User Picture]From: [info]staff_kit
2009-08-31 02:10 am (UTC)

(Link)

Oh, I get it now. Thanks. It won't be too difficult, but it will take a bit before I'm ready to do it. :)
[User Picture]From: [info]christi_morelei
2009-08-30 09:28 pm (UTC)

(Link)

The Browse feature would be nice, but I think I like the ability to edit comments better.
[User Picture]From: [info]mysticshell
2009-08-30 11:52 pm (UTC)

(Link)

I'd like to continue to see the ability to make custom layouts using CSS. How would the new system work in comparison to S2? I'd also like to see the notificication system actually work - tracking, subscriptions, private messaging etc.

And forgive my stupidity, but what exactly do you mean by not supporting BML? What does that mean we'd no longer have?

For the comment editing, I strongly suggest that no one be able to edit comments that have already been replied to. I can see tons of drama spinning out of control from someone making a comment, someone replying, and then the first person changing the comment and making the reply seem unnecessary, useless, bitchy etc.

Honestly I'm just totally afraid of change and hope too much isn't going to be different. ;)
[User Picture]From: [info]takefive
2009-08-31 12:50 am (UTC)

(Link)

Just so you know: The comment editing system used by LJ locks the ability to edit a comment that has been replied to, for likely that exact reason.
[User Picture]From: [info]mysticshell
2009-08-31 12:52 am (UTC)

(Link)

Oh, I'm aware of that. I just wanted to make sure the same rules will apply here.
[User Picture]From: [info]staff_kit
2009-08-31 02:17 am (UTC)

(Link)

I didn't know that about LJ's comment editing. It's a good idea, so I'll do the same.
[User Picture]From: [info]staff_kit
2009-08-31 02:17 am (UTC)

(Link)

Notifications will definitely work.

BML (Better Markup Language) is the language that LJ is written in. I honestly have no idea if any user-level tools use BML, but I know that I'm not going to try and write a BML parser.

As for styles - can someone tell me what the difference is between S2 and straight CSS?

Finally, I hope to minimize change as well, but in the interest of time, I'm only going to implement the most popular / most requested features of LJ to start with. Over time I'll get more features, but I want to get the first version out ASAP.
[User Picture]From: [info]emiri
2009-08-31 01:43 am (UTC)

(Link)

The edit comment feature would be great, but more than that, I'm sure that an automated payment system for accounts like LJ has would help enormously.
[User Picture]From: [info]staff_kit
2009-08-31 02:11 am (UTC)

(Link)

Automated paid account processing is high on the list. Trust me. :)
[User Picture]From: [info]emiri
2009-08-31 02:27 am (UTC)

(Link)

Good to know! Those are the only two things I really miss, so I'll sit tight.
[User Picture]From: [info]agent_anarchy
2009-08-31 05:56 am (UTC)

(Link)

How will this be affecting communities, how they're set up, and the current options for running them?

Also, I'm not sure if this has been explained, but do we get to keep our current journals or will we have to make them again? Will we get enough advanced warning to back things up if there is a move?
[User Picture]From: [info]staff_kit
2009-08-31 12:12 pm (UTC)

(Link)

At the present time, I don't see this affecting communities at all.

I'm hoping that you'll get to keep your current journals. Content and comments should be doable, but styles may not. I don't know yet, and won't know for a while, 'cos I'm not to a point where I'm ready to implement a style system yet.
From: [info]cesy.dreamwidth.org
2009-08-31 10:06 pm (UTC)

(Link)

I'm a little puzzled as to how you think you can do this without affecting communities at all - are you seriously planning to reproduce all the community-specific features in your first release of the new Inksome?
[User Picture]From: [info]staff_kit
2009-09-01 03:32 am (UTC)

(Link)

Note that I did say "at the present time". :)
[User Picture]From: [info]mellow
2009-09-12 02:13 am (UTC)

(Link)

'kay, I'm a dork and haven't been following along for a while but I figured I'd ask anyway.. have you guys figured out the problem with embedding yet? You know, youtube videos and the like. I swear that was the one thing that kept me from consistently using the site, but I've since gotten used to it in the event it won't be fixed for a long time.

that aside, this post has reminded me once again why I liked inksome in the first place. ♥